Himself benefiting from my wish to check in at a cheap hotel or motel like Motel 6, the taxi driver carried me at the limit of the town. So far the transport will cost me more than the hoteland not only once, but for every day while I will stay here. For proving his lack of sympathy, he was the first taxi driver who did not help me pick up my suitcases. I thought that in Las Vegas and Los Angeles I was lucky to find kind drivers. But I realized soon that Dallas is a different town.
The receptionist from the motel too was not polite. But at least her education or the absence of it did not cost me more. Surprisingly were the precautionary measures! The office looks like a very safe bank, or a wellguarded prison. Bars were doubling both doors and windows. She came out behind the bars of a window at the left of the counter. And only after she made sure that I do not want anything else but a room for rest, she closed that window, came at the counter, and lifted its windows with bars as well.
The room is good, similar with other rooms of Motel 6s network, proving that the system works even in Dallas.
The first morning in Dallas it turned out to be cold and windy, but it was a false alarm. About noon, it got warm, even nice.
The downtown has several high and imposing buildings. In USA, only New York has a huge center, if we think to Manhattan. The others have only several high buildings. Among them, Dallas could be considered to have a relative large downtown. But its characteristic feature is not the size, but the originality. It is just beautiful. A beauty made with glass and aluminum! It is hard to say if it has a real aesthetic value, or it is only an effect of the novelty, but I like it. It is obvious the town has a strong financial strength. Nothing Texan, can one see with tourist eye. Everything is only modern. The originality and modernism give the beauty of Dallas.
From the towns that I saw up to now, Dallas has the most modern center. Its architects knew how to bring together plants in the midst of the concrete, glass and aluminum.
I could not take photos of high buildings closely. The glass used here on large scale is useful. It reflects the neighboring buildings. I took such photos, aiming at the image of the building on the glass of the opposite ones.
A surprising thing! I am drinking a good coffee. It is for the first time in USA, where coffee is a waterish. I drank it like water, or instead of water, sometimes with a cup of 1/4 liter or even a pint. The name of the café is Renaissance Town, like the building. I cannot say I am feeling as fresh as a "burnedagain" as an advertising says but surely I am more cheered up, not as much due to the caffeine, but thanks to remembering the taste of a good coffee.
In Dallas, like in other large towns, the activity in downtown occurs inside the buildings and underground where everything one wants is to be found. The visible people are almost exclusively of second class much inferior to those from Los Angeles, for example. And it is so, not only regarding this aspect, but also concerning peoples behavior. Many AfroAmerican people, lots, selfconfident, showing that it is them who make the rule here. It is clear that their adaptation in the civilized world is tough when the essential will is absent. The offices area has a more comfortable position.
High class is not to be seen on the streets. They live separate. As for the middle class, I am wondering if it exists.
In the South without doubt it is much more disruptive behavior than the North. From the hygiene to the rightness and morality, everything is only more or less done in the South.
Being in Dallas, no one could ignore the name of Kennedy. I do not know where the other presidents were killed Lincoln, Garfield, McKinley)but Dallas is associate with this assassination probably forever. There are two monuments in Kennedys memory. One of them is ugly and without sense, made seemingly to furnish a waste ground. As an alternative, the other one is nice and close to the place where the tragedy happened.
The two of a kind, Dallas and Kennedy inspire lots of more or less philosophical thoughts, but for not falling is such a mood now. Here are some amazing similarities with Lincoln, which I received via Internet:
And now, the kicker:
Beyond the joke, Kennedy remains a sad character in the history, despite his important role in the assimilation of AfroAmerican population. For the moment, the South still keeps segregationist sentiments. I remarked these sentiments in Georgia. The Martin Luther Kings land, in the aristocratic distance has the white people facing to the non-whites. It is strong visible in Dallas, where the lack of aristocratic elegance does not hamper them to keep the distance from each other. The effect is the expected one: the AfroAmericans are unruly.
About Kennedys decision, supposed to be one of the probably causes of his death, I remember a study that I read at the end of the 1960s in a French publication. I keep in mind that moment, because then, trying to improve my French, I was looking for French publications, which used to be difficult enough to get in Romania of these communist years. The topic of the study was just an analysis of the ways in which the American politics could solve for long term the AfroAmericans matter. From these three possibilities it is always nice to have three ways the middle one was preferred, namely the assimilation. In fact, it was the single reasonable one, as the other two were inadmissible. This option seems natural today, but it was not the same forty years ago.
Coming back to my motel, the traffic is difficult. The car goes extremely slow. Yes, Dallas is a large and busy town, very active.
I remember something: "It is not what your country can do for you, it is what you can do for your country". Kennedy said it in his inaugural address.
Apparently, most people want money. As they never have enough, they spend almost entirely their life trying to earn more and more money. In this purpose, they often fight against each other with all means, more or less admissible. The goodness is forgotten. Becoming oldaged persons, they come to the conclusion that money is not too important. Why?
Actually, they have in view not money but certain concrete objectives. People want money for buying something: objects, services, power, etc. The objectives are not the same. A young person might want a bicycle, a motorbike, later on a car, another car, a house, a larger house, and so on. During his life, he frequently changes the criterion. As an old person, he wonders what was the utility of his efforts to reach these objectives, because his actual ones are much different. After a life of fight, sprinkled with lots of enemies, triumphant or defeated, he comes to the conclusion that goodness deserves a greater appreciation. Sometimes it is too late.
Education can make us to understand this truth sooner. Thats why justifying goodness is an everlasting topic.
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |