Aaron, Moses
Adesida, Dotun
Al-Assady, Abdul-Settar
Baraka, Ahmed
Binx, Eugene
Biswas, Rakesh
Brown, Dr. Glen
Chambers, Eric
Chambers, Lesley
Chappel, T. A.
Culling, Peter
Diwivedi, Tripuresh Dhar
Falit, Joseph E.
Fawcett, Shaun
Fitzgerald-Clarke, Michael
Fleming, Suzanne
Fries, Todd
Gheorghiu, Cristache
Huchu, Tendai
Jacobsen, Heidi
King, Nigel
Knapp, Artie
Kumar, G. Ram
Lay, Vicheka
Litt, Dr. Jerome Z.
Majumdar, Pritis Chandra
Miller, Harley
Maffey, Laura
Maffey, Riccardo
Milazzo, Ronald
Minya, Dzimba
Neo
Okonkwo, Ikechukwu
Patterson, R.J.
Rinaldi, Jacquie
Roberts, Ella
Sharp, Ian
Sooriyarachchi, Janaki
Spudich, Giulietta
Taylor, Roy
Thomas, Dennis
Thompson, Tantse
Turley, Keith
Watson, Rob
Yarbrough, Alan |
Celebrity Book Store
|
|
AND THAT'S WHAT MAKES ONLINE BOOK CLUBS GREAT!!!
It's not often face-2-face book club members get the chance to have an author respond to their comments. Online book clubs make it possible for members and authors to have meaningful discussion about the eBooks. Online communication really is global. And GLOBUSZ makes it possible. WAY TO GO!
NOTE: When Reviewers post their comments to the blog, Globusz Publishing emails the authors to advise them of the post. Authors are given the opportunity to write a response if they choose to do so.
We believe this brings a degree of balance to the blog, and provides authors with a chance to explain their work more fully. It also allows authors to respond to any negative criticism a reviewer may make. Not all authors accept our offer.
|
|
 |
| Monday, June 23, 2008 |
 |
The adventure I never had
Ian writes:
Way, way back when I was in the final year of high school (OK, in 1956) many of us heard stories of the big adventure and big money to be found shooting crocodiles in the far north of Australia. They were the days when we thought the only good croc was a dead croc, and the skins fetched high prices for handbags and those dreadful boots men used to wear.
For a lad who'd grown up in one of the world's most provincial and isolated cities more than a thousand kilometres of rough dirt road helped separate Perth and the eastern Australian states the prospect seemed appealing. Fortunately, this lad had sensible parents.
From time to time I've wondered what I would have experienced if I'd packed my bags and headed for Darwin. I'm about to find out.
In the Globusz catalogue, I've spotted an interesting read Parched Seas, by Ian Sharp an account by a guy who did just what I'd once dreamed of.
According to the blurb:
An employment advertisement for fisherman to work the Northern Queensland winter season is the catalyst to set the wheel-of-fortune spinning and the saga unfolding.Attracted by the promise of a tough and lucrative lifestyle, the young Sharp embellishes his resume with a bundle of skills drawn straight from his imagination, and hes delighted when his creativity is rewarded and he gets the job.After handing over two hundred and fifty Australian pounds, as a returnable sign-on bond, to Captain McKenna, and his partner Leo, Sharp joins fifteen other young hopefuls and takes his place on the team. The hefty bond money, paid by all the workers, except for Sharp, is designed to deter the crew from jumping ship.
Now why would all these guys want to jump ship? After dipping into Parched Seas, and noting Sharp's gutsy writing, I think I'm about to find why.
I'll share my thoughts further when I've read it properly.
http://www.globusz.com/ebooks/Parched/index.asp
POSTED BY IAN SKINNER
 |
| Friday, June 20, 2008 |
 |
The Principles of Aesthetics
By Dewitt H. Parker
Professor of Philosophy in the University of Michigan
OK, as far as book reviews go, I've decided to opt for short and sweet. This guy Parker knows his stuff; and hes a pretty good writer too. The Principles of Aesthetics mightnt appeal to everyone, but Dewitt Parker knows how to use words to draw even hesitant readers into his world; he shows them another dimension of art and beauty.
This book got me in, and kept me engaged. Amazing really because when it comes to art criticism, Ive got to admit Im a hard nosed sceptic. The topic usually gets me a bit hot under the collar. But Parker managed to put out the fire and I was engrossed. Art criticism probably has a limited audience. I think that many people are like me and think that describing art, and its multitude of applications, is a difficult thing to do; and few do it all that well anyway.
I guess theyre right, but if the work is tackled by someone who really knows the subject, and they have a good command of the written word, then it makes the task easier. Readers then find the concepts are easier to understand. I often say, describing art, is like trying to explain how a woman thinks. Its a challenge.
Parkers work puts many art theorists to shame. His style has incredibly easy and his prose are superb. Ive noticed that some people get uptight when theyre told they should observe Art in a certain way. Im one of them. But Parker has produced a work that will help to promote understanding of a topic many people avoid. His writing style is pretty near perfect (I wish I could write as fluently as him). He examines a wide range of Art topics and dissects them like a brain surgeon. Even if Art isnt your thing, I recommend this book to you anyway. Im sure youll enjoy the authors style, grace and intelligence. Its a prose treasure, because it demonstrates the real meaning of good writing.
Not only is Mr. Parker is a great writer and a great thinker, hes an Art sage. If youre hoping to find some wise comment on amorphous and experimental themes that come under the heading of modern art, youll be disappointed. I recon Parker was pretty smart not to tackle this genre. I think he avoided the whole scene because he knows its mission impossible at the best of times, and taking it on usally sends a sane human stark raving mad. No, Parker understood boundaries, and he stayed within them. Hes a classical art guru so he kept to what he knows best.
Hes a philosophical master, who speaks with authority and genuine insight on how mediums of expression should be viewed and understood; even by the novice. But just remember if you want to learn about the inner workings of modern art, this is not the book for you.
Its more of an academic outlook on how classical and pure Art ought to be appreciated. Theres nothing experimental going on between these covers. D.H. Parker will guide the beginner, the experienced, and the expert through the amazing world of Art appreciation. Hell open doors and windows to let fresh air in, to clear the mind. He will help the reader gain a true unadulterated understanding of Art.
Now Ive said all the nice stuff about Parker, Im going to get out my hatchet and go for the jugular. I totally disagree with his view that writing is the lowest form of Art and expression. Ill defend writing as a high art form with passion. And I can back up my argument with the statement that if Parker didnt have good writing skills, then all his art knowledge would be limited to a very small audience, and would be lost pretty quickly.
Writing has allowed Parkers ideas to live on. Writing has made them immortal (well almost). How can the man condemn the very thing that has made it possible for him to reach a world wide audience? Art is Art, and its beauty is unmistakably clear. But I look forward to the day when an Art critic; whether hes a Professor of Philosophy at the University of Michigan, or anywhere else, can admit that writing is a HIGH art form.
Why do so many academics say that writing is merely the use of words? Hey tell that to Shakespeare. Why dont you decide for yourself? You wont be disappointed if you invest the time in this book. And I can guarantee it will change you.
http://www.globusz.com/ebooks/Aesthetics/index.asp
Review by Christian Crescente
Browse our alphabetical listing:
|